Integrating Different Part Of Your Personality with Eben Pagan
Eben Pagan teaches a powerful neurolinguistic programming exercise called Parts Integration to resolve inner conflict between the part of you that wants to play it safe and the part that wants to take risks. Using a hands-on visualization technique, you'll learn to merge these conflicting aspects of your personality into a unified, powerful force for business growth.
Key Moments
How to do the Parts Integration exercise -- A step-by-step NLP technique to resolve inner conflict between your safety-seeking and risk-taking personalities
Conflicting Personality Parts Both Want to Keep You Safe
Both conflicting parts have positive intentions - they're both trying to keep you safe and growing, which allows them to work together as a team when properly integrated
▶ 5:54
Two Conflicting Parts Every Entrepreneur Has
Most entrepreneurs have two prevalent conflicting parts: the safety-seeking part that wants to stick with what has worked, and the risk-taking part that wants to innovate and try new things
▶ 2:03
Cruise Ship Analogy for Multiple Personality Functions
We don't actually have one personality but many different parts that take turns being in control. It's like a cruise ship with different people operating various functions - engine room, steering, sonar. We just don't consciously notice when different parts take over.
▶ 0:49
Applying Parts Integration Whenever Inner Conflict Arises
The Parts Integration exercise can be applied whenever you notice inner conflict to align whatever conflicting parts are causing the misalignment
▶ 3:05
Visualizing and Merging Conflicting Parts in Your Hands
Hold your hands out and visualize your safety-seeking part in your left hand and your risk-taking part in your right hand. Notice their colors, shapes, and textures. Then bring your hands together to merge the parts, draw the integrated combination to your chest, and push it into your body to spread throughout.
▶ 5:04
Relevant Clips15
- How-To
How to do the Parts Integration exercise -- A step-by-step NLP technique to resolve inner conflict between your safety-seeking and risk-taking personalities
- Teaching▶ 5:04
Visualizing and Merging Conflicting Parts in Your Hands
Hold your hands out and visualize your safety-seeking part in your left hand and your risk-taking part in your right hand. Notice their colors, shapes, and textures. Then bring your hands together to merge the parts, draw the integrated combination to your chest, and push it into your body to spread throughout.
- Teaching▶ 0:49
Cruise Ship Analogy for Multiple Personality Functions
We don't actually have one personality but many different parts that take turns being in control. It's like a cruise ship with different people operating various functions - engine room, steering, sonar. We just don't consciously notice when different parts take over.
- Teaching▶ 6:04
Safety and Risk Parts Have Positive Complementary Intentions
Both parts have positive intentions - they're trying to keep you safe and growing. The safety-seeking part can help the risk-taking part by providing a more tempered approach, while the innovative part can help the safety-seeking part by creating beneficial change.
- Teaching
NLP Parts Integration for Inner Conflict Resolution
Parts Integration is a neurolinguistic programming exercise that helps resolve inner conflict by merging conflicting aspects of your personality. You visualize different parts in each hand, then physically merge them together and integrate them into your body.
- Teaching▶ 2:27
Safety Seeker vs Risk Taker Conflict in Entrepreneurs
Most entrepreneurs have two conflicting parts: one that wants to play it safe and stick with what has worked, and another that wants to take risks and try new things. When these parts conflict, you get way out of alignment and struggle with decision-making.
- Teaching▶ 5:19
Parts Integration Merges Safety and Risk-Taking
Parts Integration is performed by visualizing the safety-seeking part in your left hand and the risk-taking part in your right hand, then merging them together and integrating them into your chest
- Teaching▶ 2:03
Two Conflicting Parts Every Entrepreneur Has
Most entrepreneurs have two prevalent conflicting parts: the safety-seeking part that wants to stick with what has worked, and the risk-taking part that wants to innovate and try new things
- Teaching▶ 1:55
Personality Parts Shift Control Throughout the Day
We unconsciously shift between different personality parts throughout the day - lazy parts, motivated parts, loving parts, independent parts - without realizing when control switches
- Teaching▶ 5:54
Conflicting Personality Parts Both Want to Keep You Safe
Both conflicting parts have positive intentions - they're both trying to keep you safe and growing, which allows them to work together as a team when properly integrated
- Teaching▶ 3:05
Applying Parts Integration Whenever Inner Conflict Arises
The Parts Integration exercise can be applied whenever you notice inner conflict to align whatever conflicting parts are causing the misalignment
- Teaching
Planning Customer Relationship Timeline Over One Year
We don't have one personality but many personalities - each of us contains multiple 'selves' that take turns being in control throughout the day
Show 3 more
- Quotable▶ 6:49
Safety and Risk Parts Working as an Integrated Team
these two parts of you can work together and they can make a great team as long as you integrate and align them
- Quotable▶ 2:49
When Conflicting Parts Push You Out of Alignment
when these two parts of us conflict we really get way out of alignment
- Quotable▶ 0:16
Each of Us Has Many Personalities Not One
each of us does not have one personality we have many personalities
Entities Touched
Concepts
Questions
Canonical Teachings
Summary
Understanding Multiple Personalities Within One Person
Eben introduces the counterintuitive concept that we don't have one personality but many different parts that take turns being in control. Using Peter Ouspensky's diagram and a cruise ship metaphor, he explains how different aspects of our personality operate like different crew members managing various functions.
The Two Conflicting Parts Most Entrepreneurs Face
Most entrepreneurs struggle with inner conflict between two prevalent parts: the safety-seeking part that wants to stick with what has worked versus the risk-taking part that wants to innovate and try new things. When these parts conflict, entrepreneurs get way out of alignment and struggle with decision-making.
The Parts Integration Exercise Step-by-Step
Eben guides listeners through the actual NLP Parts Integration exercise, having them visualize each conflicting part in their hands, notice the colors and textures, then physically merge the parts together and integrate them into their chest. The process helps align the conflicting aspects into a unified force.
How Conflicting Parts Can Work Together
The breakthrough insight is that both conflicting parts have positive intentions - they're both trying to keep you safe and growing. When properly integrated, the safety-seeking part can help the risk-taking part with a more tempered approach, while the innovative part can serve the safety-seeking part by creating beneficial change.
Counterpoint
Claim: “You have one consistent personality that makes decisions”
Reframe: You actually have many different personalities within you that take turns being in control, like different crew members operating a cruise ship
Peter Ouspensky's diagram with 30-40 'I's in a circle, cruise ship metaphor with engine room operators, steering person, sonar monitor - most people don't consciously notice when different parts take over
Claim: “Inner conflict between safety and risk-taking is a problem to eliminate”
Reframe: These conflicting parts both have positive intentions and can work together as a powerful team when properly integrated
Safety-seeking part helps risk-taking part with tempered approach, while innovative part serves safety-seeking part by creating beneficial change - they can make a great team when aligned
Topics
Coaching Strategies
Business Frameworks
Common Mistakes